In the November 2010 press release, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said, “By banning providers of these services from collecting fees until the customer is satisfied with the results, this rule will protect consumers from being victimized by these scams.”

The MARS rule has a three-prong approach – it bans advance fees, requires certain disclosures and prohibits certain claims:

Advance Fees

Mortgage Relief companies may not collect any fee until they have provided the homeowner with:

• a written offer from their lender or servicer that the consumer decides is acceptable; and
• a written document from the lender or servicer describing the key changes to the mortgage that would result if the consumer accepts the offer.

Required Disclosures

In any advertising and in communications directed at individual consumers (such as telemarketing calls), the mortgage relief companies must make the following disclosures:

• they are not associated with the government, and their services have not been approved by the government or the consumer’s lender;
• the lender may not agree to change the consumer’s loan; and
• if companies tell consumers to stop paying their mortgage, they must also tell them that they could lose their home and damage their credit rating.

Further, these companies must also disclose in their communications to consumers that

• they can stop doing business with the company at any time,
• can accept or reject any offer the company obtains from the lender or servicer, and
• if they reject the offer, they don’t have to pay the company’s fee – said fee must also be disclosed

Prohibited Claims

The MARS Rule prohibits mortgage relief companies from making any false or misleading claims about their services, including claims about:

• the likelihood of consumers getting the results they seek;
• the company’s affiliation with government or private entities;
• the consumer’s payment and other mortgage obligations;
• the company’s refund and cancellation policies;
• whether the company has performed the services it promised;
• whether the company will provide legal representation to consumers;
• the availability or cost of any alternative to for-profit mortgage assistance relief services;
• the amount of money a consumer will save by using their services; or
• the cost of the services.

In addition, the rule prohibits mortgage relief companies from telling homeowners to stop communicating with their lenders or their representatives.   Further, these companies must also have reliable evidence to back up any claims they make about the benefits, performance, or effectiveness of the services they provide.

Lastly, it is a violation of the MARS Rule for any person to provide substantial assistance or support to a MARS Provider when that person knows or consciously avoids knowing that the MARS Provider is engaged in any act or practice that violates this Final Rule. (16 CFR Section 322.6).

Q&A:

What Exactly Are Mortgage Relief Services?

Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) are services offered or provided to a Consumer for consideration that are intended directly or indirectly to assist the Consumer with regard to:

1. Stopping or postponing a foreclosure sale;
2. Negotiating or arranging a Modification of a Dwelling Loan;
3. Obtaining a forbearance in the timing of payments due on a Dwelling Loan;
4. Negotiating or arranging any extension of the time period for curing a default or reinstating the Dwelling Loan;
5. Obtaining a waiver of an acceleration clause or balloon payment in a Dwelling Loan;
6. Negotiating or arranging a short sale, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, title reconveyance, sale/leaseback or any other disposition of the Dwelling other than a sale to a third-party purchaser;
7. Offering or conducting a Forensic Loan Audit which is a legal analysis of mortgage loan documents for the purpose of finding compliance violations under federal and/or state law or regulation for the alleged purpose of helping Consumers acquire leverage over their Servicers;
8. Marketing of services to assist consumers in selling a   Dwelling to a third party if the intent of the sale is to enable the Consumer to avoid foreclosure; and
9. Marketing of refinancing options by Mortgage Brokers if offered to avoid a foreclosure.

Does MARS Apply to Attorneys?

Attorneys are fully exempt if they:

1. Provide mortgage assistance relief as part of the practice of law;
2. Are licensed to practice law in the state in which the consumer for whom the attorney is providing mortgage assistance relief services resides or in which the consumer’s dwelling is located;
3. Comply with state laws and regulations that cover the same type of conduct the rule requires;
4. Deposit any funds received from the consumer prior to performing legal services in a client trust account and withdraw fees only as they are earned; and
5. Comply with all state laws and regulations, including licensing regulations, applicable to client trust accounts.

Does MARS Apply to Real Estate Agents?

It appears from examination of the language contained in the Supplementary Information in the Federal Register that the intent was to avoid including real estate brokers and agents handling sales of real property in the definition of MARS.  However, it is certainly clear that real estate agents and brokers handling short sales, title re-conveyance or any other sale or endeavor undertaken in an effort to stop a foreclosure sale would be covered by the MARS definition.

The Supplementary Information states that the FTC does not consider the typical functions of real estate brokers, including showing homes, finding homes for Borrowers and listing homes for sale, to be MARS functions.  Nonetheless, any endeavor undertaken by a real estate agent or broker in an effort to prevent a foreclosure other than these typical functions, such as negotiating with a Servicer the terms of a short sale,WILL be considered a MARS activity.

The MARS rule is something with which everyone involved in, either directly or indirectly, assisting consumers avoid foreclosure will need to understand and be in compliance with.  It is broad and far reaching. The penalties for non-compliance with the FTC’s new MARS rule are $11,000 a day.

Related posts:

1. DON’T SAY I DIDN’T WARN YOU! NY Attorney General’s Crackdown on the Loan Modification Industry
2. Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor’s Dream!
3. Short Sales & No-Flip Clauses in the Approval Letter – Removing a Roadblock

It is not light reading by a long stretch. Understanding the securitization process from the originator to the Trustee, locating and understanding the governing document, the Pooling & Servicing Agreement (PSA), is no simple matter. But we have done just that and analyzed numerous defective Assignments of Mortgage for New York City properties.  These banks and their respective attorneys flagrantly ignore the rule of law, routinely perjury themselves, do documents without authority, and directly violate the terms of the PSA.  These banks have also been paid over and over for the same loan because of the over-collateralization of these mortgage securities, but seek to enrich themselves further by availing themselves of the remedy of foreclosure.  And yet, the tax payer pays them yet again, via the Obama Administration, instead of taking that same money to make jobs to bolster our sagging economy.

These banks are posting record profits for 2010 as our country fails to recover for lack of not only jobs but of credit.  The purpose of the TARP funds was to give an incentive to the banks to extend credit but they failed to do so and really decreased lending.  Congress, in their haste, failed to include any strings in that gift package.  The Wall Street Journal indicated that such failure was the reason for the decreased lending:

The fact that loan portfolios are shrinking at many of the largest TARP recipients underscores how few strings Treasury Department officials attached to the infusions. That has made it hard to prevent banks from using the money to pay dividends, make acquisitions and fund bonuses for top executives.

Pioneers saw what the banks were doing – getting rich from tax payers’ monies and then enriching themselves further through foreclosure of these overcollateralized securities or peoples’ homes. They fought the banks in court by going back to the basics and not just blinding accepting the banks’ right to foreclose on their “security”.  It started with “produce the note” because the whole mortgage industry had gotten sloppy and couldn’t locate their documents.  But then it went further, questioning whether the bank really owned the Note and if you could foreclose on a mortgage once it had morphed into a security. MERS‘ role was being investigated and foreclosure defense lawyers questioned whether or not it could bring a foreclosure action as plaintiff, because it did not really own the Note as well as failed to maintain a proper chain of assignment.

These very foreclosure defense attorneys and judges, inundated with millions of foreclosure actions, started to see an hideous pattern and the same names over and over again, executing assignments, affidavits of merit etc.  Brooklyn’s own Judge Schack has been on the forefront of demanding legal compliance from the banks and making them account for their failure to adhere to the law as well as outright committing fraud.  Our courts have been on the forefront of insuring that homeowners’ rights are not trampled – that the banks act in excellent faith and when they don’t – holding them liable for it.  The banks and their attorneys step very carefully into our courts these days for dread of the ultimate punishment – dismissal of their action with prejudice.

I reckon 2011 is the year we take back our country from Wall Street and the banks. The tide is turning.

Related posts:

1. Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor’s Dream!
2. Short Sales & No-Flip Clauses in the Approval Letter – Removing a Roadblock
3. NY Governor Looking to Expand Protections for Defaulting HomeOwners, Tenants

“In today’s market, FHA research finds that acquiring, rehabilitating and the reselling these properties to prospective homeowners often takes less than 90 days. Prohibiting the use of FHA mortgage insurance for a subsequent resale within 90 days of acquisition adversely impacts the willingness of sellers to allow contracts from potential FHA buyers because they must consider holding costs and the risk of vandalism associated with allowing a property to sit vacant over a 90-day period of time.”

The online real estate community was buzzing yesterday as news of this waiver spread quickly. The investor “gurus” are, of course, rejoicing and spreading the news far and wide, without a careful read of the Waiver itself.  The intent of this temporary policy change is to allow investors to take title to a property, rehab it and sell it quickly. It is not a panacea for those investors who pick up a property at a discount, seeking to flip it for a profit in a “back to back” or “double” closing.  For those types of transactions, the 90 day seasoning rule is a non-issue if you utilize a land trust correctly.

HUD’s Mortgagee Letter 2006-14 clarified the Rule and Regulations set forth in 24 CFR 203.37a concerning the eligibility of properties for FHA insurance and the rules governing sales of property.  As I have discussed in a previous blog post,  Legal Analysis of FHA’s Seasoning Requirements, the real estate and mortgage industry routinely misunderstands and applies these eligibility rules incorrectly and it appears that the trend is continuing with this new Waiver.

FAQS:

1. Does it have to be a property bought through a small sale, bank auction or an REO to be eligible under the Waiver?

No. There are no requirements in the Waiver concerning the status of the property itself.  It is not necessary to demonstrate the distressed nature of the property.

2. So I can get a property under contract, do a contract with a potential FHA buyer and close with my FHA buyer the same day or the day after I buy the property?

No this transaction would not be eligible for FHA insurance. The waiver is really of the requirement that the real estate contract be executed on the 91st day after the investor takes title to the property. The requirement that the investor own the property is still in effect and therefore Contract Vendees and Assignments of contract are still prohibited.  Further, an application for an FHA mortgage cannot be submitted to a Lender for consideration without a fully executed Contract.  Therefore, Back to Back Closings will be impossible.

3. So I can close a week after I take title?

Virtually impossible for several reasons. I venture that there are nearly no Lenders in this post-bubble market that will take an application for an FHA mortgage and be in a position to close a week later.  I am going to stretch that to probably 30 days.  This is certain if your sale price to your FHA buyer is 20% or more higher than your acquisition price (do the math – its not that hard to hit that number – especially in certain areas of the country where housing prices are below $50,000). If the sale price exceeds the 20% threshhold, the investor will have to document the increase in value with supporting documentation and/or a second appraisal and the Lender will have to obtain a Property Inspection Report (see paragraph 2 of the Waiver).  This report will not be ordered prior to application submittal and as discussed previously, that doesn’t take place until there is a fully executed Contract of Sale.

4. I found this fantastic property that my buddy picked up 2 months ago for $120,000.00.  He rehabbed it and I am in contract to buy it from him for $220,000.  I want to flip it to an FHA buyer for $250,000.00 can I do it?

You will have to wait until the 91st day after you close title to enter into a Contract of Sale with the FHA buyer. The Waiver will not apply if there is a history of prior flipping activity in the 12 month chain of title (see paragraph 1(c) of the Waiver).

5. In April, the Treasury’s Small Sale Program goes into effect and there should be a lot of distressed properties coming on to the market. The Waiver is going to be a huge help in moving those properties!

No, it isn’t.  Apparently, government offices do not communicate with each other before issuing rulings – one of the requirements under the Treasury small sale program is that the Contract include a representation that the Purchaser will hold the property for 90 days post-closing.  Perhaps the Treasury will revise its Directive and remove this offending language (which, as I had discussed previously, is extremely small-sighted).

Conclusion

Investors should rejoice as finally they are receiving the recognition they deserve: properties are moving because of their hard work and without the proper incentive, it wouldn’t happen. Instead of being the black sheep of the real estate community, investors are a major part of the solution.  This Waiver is what investors need to get the properties rehabbed, sold and occupied to ameliorate the problem of abandoned and blighted homes. It is not a license to flip and should you wish to engage in that type of activity, you will not be able to use this Waiver to accomplish your goals.

Related posts:

1. Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor’s Dream!
2. Seasoning and FHA’s Time Restrictions on Resales – a Legal Analysis
3. Short Sales & No-Flip Clauses in the Approval Letter – Removing a Roadblock

Small sale transactions are essential to go properties in furtherance of rebuilding our economy. They directly benefit several parties including:

• the distressed homeowner: unburdened by debt he cannot afford without the same level of credit score hurt a foreclosure would cause as well as possible deficiency judgments;
• the real estate agent: earns commissions (provides jobs etc);
• the small sale bank: removes nonperforming assets from its books,  usually at far less of a loss than if the property became an REO; and
• real estate investors: acquiring properties at a discount provides incentive to negotiate as well as to seek out qualified purchasers

Part of the fallout from the real estate market crash is a rash of negativity aimed directly at real estate investors.  They, along with mortgage brokers and other members of the real estate community, are being made the scapegoats for the Housing Bubble.  I’m going to clue you in on a small secret – it really wasn’t them.  Not that there weren’t unscrupulous investors, loan officers etc. – far from it.  Point the finger directly at the Banks and the Government. The Banks needed those deals to package up and sells as mortgage backed securities on Wall Street.  When there was not enough product, they lowered their standards to bring in more loans. They blatantly ignored fraud reports and lended on questionable properties. The banks made exotic loan products and recklessly offered them without regard to ability to pay.  The Government wanted to increase homeownership among minorities – hence ACORN. It made several programs and incentives to push the percentage of homeownership way above the standard amount.  I am also going to point the finger at the American Homeowner who chose to use their home as an ATM, or who lied on their loan applications because they needed to compete with the Joneses.  Lets also add real estate agents to the mix who fought for higher and higher appraised values and selected comparables for their Broker Price Opinions (BPO) to influence the appraiser to come in higher. (RANT finished)

These very parties, who irresponsibly handed money to unqualified buyers on overvalued properties, as part of their attempt to pass the blame to real estate investors, are throwing around the “fraud” mark with regard to flipping small sale transactions (for more discussion on Small Sale Fraud please read my prior blog post). In an attempt to curtail the investor’s ability to flip these properties, some banks are including “no-flip” clauses in their small sale approval letters. I have seen this language in Bank of America, GMAC, EMC,Countrywide to name a few.  There are varying forms of this language from purporting to restrict the transfer of the subject property for 30 days post closing to voiding the transfer and reinstating the note and security agreements, post-closing, if the bank determines that there was fraud.

The simplest language to address in the 30 day post-closing restriction on transfer.  Lets review basic contract law and the doctrine of privity.  Basically a contract does not confer rights or impose obligations upon anyone except for the parties to it. The contractual relationship is between the homeowner and the bank. The small sale approval is a settlement of the debt obligation between these parties.  The bank has no contractual relationship with the investor and/or buyer and therefore this language, purporting to impose a restriction on the investor/buyer, is unenforceable against the investor/buyer. With respect to the other no-flip clauses, Bob Massey does an brilliant job of explaining how to handle those banks in his video:

I have located an underwriting bulletin from Stewart title which addresses these problematic clauses in small sale approval letters.  It indicates that such language makes the transaction “uninsurable”.  As Massey suggests, request that the clause be removed from the small sale approval letter as title will not insure the transaction and provide a copy of the title bulletin to support your argument. You might have to bypass the negotiator and contact a supervisor but this should be sufficient to persuade them to delete the offending language.

What have you encountered and what has worked for you? Please comment!

Related posts:

1. Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor’s Dream!
2. PropertyShark University – Short Sales Class – Tues June 17, 2008 – Don’t Miss It!!!
3. Buyer $5,000 Short – How to Close the Gap…from a NY Point of View

Section 265-b enumerates which activities are forbidden to Distressed Property Consultants:

1. Providing services without a written, fully signed contract with a homeowner;

2. Charging or collecting payment from a homeowner before completion of services;

3. Taking a Power of Attorney from a homeowner;

4. Keeping any original Loan Documents or any original documents relating to the distressed home loan;and

5. Inducing a Homeowner to executing a Contract that does not comply with the provisions of the Act.

The Contract

Section 265-b lists very specific requirements when it comes to the Contract for Distressed Consultant Services.  First, it must be in writing and must contain the entire agreement of the parties.  Therefore, oral agreements pre- and post-contract are not enforceable and the agreement is enforceable only as to those provisions contained within the four corners of the written Contract.  Also, the proposed Contract must be provided to the homeowner, in advance, for his review.

Content & Form

The NY legislature laid out very specific requirements as to the form and content of the Distressed Consultant Contract.  First, as to the font, it must be in at least 12 point type and in the same language that was used between the Consultant and the Homeowner to discuss the Consultant’s services.  For example, if the parties conversed in Spanish about the proposed services, then the resulting written contract must be in Spanish.

The Contract must provide full disclosure.  It must include:

1. the exact nature of the services to be provided by the Consultant and anyone who is associated with the consultant;

2. the total amount and terms of compensation for such services;

3. the name, business address, and telephone number of the distressed property consultant and the address (if different), phone & fax number or email address of the distressed property consultant where the homeowner can send communications to the consultant;

4. it must be dated and personally signed by the homeowner and the distressed property consultant before a Notary Public;

5. It cannot limit the liability of the Distressed Property Consultant nor waive any provisions under this Statute and cannot require arbitration of any dispute arising under the Contract;

6. it must contain a specific Right to Cancel:

a. 14 point boldface type;

b. Containing the following language with the Distressed Property Consultant accurately entering the date the right to cancel ends and his name -

NOTICE REQUIRED BY LAW

YOU MAY CANCEL THIS CONTRACT, WITHOUT ANY PENALTY OR OBLIGATION AT ANYTIME BEFORE MIDNIGHT OF _________________________ (FIFTH BUSINESS DAY AFTER EXECUTION).

_______________________________________ (THE”CONSULTANT”) OR ANYONE WORKING FOR THE CONSULTANT, MAY NOT TAKE ANY MONEY FROM YOU OR QUESTION YOU FOR MONEY UNTIL THE CONSULTANT HAS COMPLETELY FINISHED DOING EVERYTHING THIS CONTRACT SAYS THE CONSULTANT WILL DO.

YOU SHOULD CONSIDER CONSULTING AN ATTORNEY OR A GOVERNMENT-APPROVED HOUSING COUNSELOR BEFORE SIGNING ANY LEGAL DOCUMENT CONCERNING YOUR HOME. IT IS ADVISABLE THAT YOU FIND YOUR OWN ATTORNEY, AND NOT CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED OR PROVIDED TO YOU BY THE CONSULTANT. A LIST OF HOUSING COUNSELORS MAY BE FOUND ON A THE WEBSITE OF THE NEW YORK STATE BANKING DEPARTMENT, www.banking.state.ny.us OR BY CALLING THE BANKING DEPARTMENT TOLL FREE AT 1-877-BANK-NYS (1-877-226-5697).  THE LAW REQUIRES THAT THIS CONTRACT CONTAIN THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND THE CONSULTANT. YOU SHOULD NOT RELY ON ANY ORAL AGREEMENT OR PROMISE.

c. The date for the Right to Cancel: it is midnight of the 5th business day following the day the Contract was executed by both parties.

d. Notice of Cancellation:

1. must be in writing and delivered by the homeowner or the homeowner’s representative, to the Property Consultant to the address, fax or email address specified in the notice.

2. The Contract must include (2) copies of a Notice of Cancellation in the following form:

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION

YOU MAY CANCEL THIS CONTRACT, WITHOUT ANY PENALTY OR OBLIGATION, AT ANY TIME BEFORE MIDNIGHT OF _____________________________ (ENTER DATE).

TO CANCEL THIS CONTRACT, SIGN AND DATE BOTH COPIES OF THIS CANCELLATION NOTICE AND PERSONALLY DELIVER ONE COPY OR SEND IT BY FACSIMILE, UNITED STATES MAIL OR ANY ESTABLISHED COMMERCIAL LETTER DELIVERY SERVICE, INDICATING CANCELLATION TO THE DISTRESSED PROPERTY CONSULTANT AT ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

NAME OF CONTRACTOR: ________________________________
STREET ADDRESS:______________________________________
CITY, STATE, ZIP:______________________________________
FACSIMILE:___________________________________________

I HEREBY CANCEL THIS CONTRACT

Name of Homeowner: ___________________________________________

Signature of Homeowner:________________________________________

Date:_________________________________________________________

e. Compliance with Notice of Cancellation: If a Distressed Property Consultant receives the Notice of Cancellation within the proscribed time frame, the Consultant must, within (10) days, return the original Contract and any other documents signed by the Homeowner to the Homeowner.  Cancellation, of course, releases the homeowner from any obligation to pay the Distressed Property Consultant.

PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION

If a Distressed Property Consultant violates this Statute, the legislature has crafted the following penalties:

1. Court can declare Contract to be null and void;

2. If the homeowner incurs hurts because of the violation, the homeowner can recover actual and consequential hurts, as well as costs, from the Consultant;

3. If the Consultant intentionally or recklessly violates the provisions of this Statute, the Court can award to the homeowner treble (3x) hurts, attorney’s fees and costs;

4. An application can be made by the Attorney General to issue an injunction forcing the Consultant to stop and desist from engaging in future distressed consulting activities without requiring proof that any person has been injured or hurt and also can require restitution; and

5. The court can fine the Consultant not more than $10,000 for each violation.

There you have it – if you are offering any type of services to a Homeowner who is behind on their mortgage, real estate taxes etc., first determine if you are a Distressed Property Consultant (and not a member of an exempt category) and if your Homeowner and their financial distress is covered by the Statute.  If so, make sure you are in compliance by following the tenets outlined above.  The penalties can be severe but at least now, you have an outline for a plot of compliance.

Related posts:

1. DON’T SAY I DIDN’T WARN YOU! NY Attorney General’s Crackdown on the Loan Modification Industry
2. Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor’s Dream!
3. Seasoning and FHA’s Time Restrictions on Resales – a Legal Analysis