<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Blackacre 2.0deed | Blackacre 2.0</title> <atom:link href="http://www.nyrelawyers.com/tag/deed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.nyrelawyers.com</link> <description>Thoughts, Musings, Analysis on Law &#38; Real Estate</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Real Estate Law Update: New York State Decisions of Interest</title><link>http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/08/real-estate-law-update-new-york-state-decisions-of-interest/</link> <comments>http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/08/real-estate-law-update-new-york-state-decisions-of-interest/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Kathleen Scanlon</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[case law]]></category> <category><![CDATA[commission]]></category> <category><![CDATA[constructive trust]]></category> <category><![CDATA[deed]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category> <category><![CDATA[new york]]></category> <category><![CDATA[property]]></category> <category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyrelawyers.com/?p=7</guid> <description><![CDATA[JOHNSON v. MELNIKOFF, 2008-08857 [2d Dept 8-4-2009] 2008-08857 &#67;&#104;&#111;&#115;&#101; &#111;&#110; August 4, 2009. &#73;&#110; &#97;&#110; action, inter alia, pursuant &#116;&#111; RPAPL article 15 &#116;&#111; determine title &#116;&#111; real property, &#116;&#104;&#101; defendant Bank &#111;&#102; &#78;&#101;&#119; York Trust Company, N.A., appeals, &#97;&#115; limited &#98;&#121; &#105;&#116;&#115; notice &#111;&#102; appeal &#97;&#110;&#100; brief, &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#115;&#111; much &#111;&#102; &#97;&#110; order &#111;&#102;...Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2011/01/mortgage-assignments-are-not-the-real-estate-investors-dream/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor&#8217;s Dream!'>Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor&#8217;s Dream!</a></li><li><a href='http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/06/dont-say-i-didnt-warn-you-ny-attorney-generals-crackdown-on-the-loan-modification-industry/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DON&#8217;T SAY I DIDN&#8217;T WARN YOU! NY Attorney General&#8217;s Crackdown on the Loan Modification Industry'>DON&#8217;T SAY I DIDN&#8217;T WARN YOU! NY Attorney General&#8217;s Crackdown on the Loan Modification Industry</a></li><li><a href='http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2008/06/the-new-york-law-journal-free-breaking-news-chief-judge-unveils-program-to-deal-with-dramatic-rise-in-foreclosures/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The New York Law Journal &#8211; Free Breaking News: Chief Judge Unveils Program to Deal With Dramatic Rise in Foreclosures'>The New York Law Journal &#8211; Free Breaking News: Chief Judge Unveils Program to Deal With Dramatic Rise in Foreclosures</a></li></ol>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><strong><a href="http://www.loislaw.com/advsrny/flwhitview.htp?lwhitid=8833395">JOHNSON v. MELNIKOFF, 2008-08857 [2d Dept 8-4-2009] 2008-08857</a><br /></strong></p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#67;&#104;&#111;&#115;&#101; &#111;&#110; August 4, 2009.</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#73;&#110; &#97;&#110; action, inter alia, pursuant &#116;&#111; RPAPL article 15 &#116;&#111;<br /> determine title &#116;&#111; real property, &#116;&#104;&#101; defendant Bank &#111;&#102; &#78;&#101;&#119; York Trust Company,<br /> N.A., appeals, &#97;&#115; limited &#98;&#121; &#105;&#116;&#115; notice &#111;&#102; appeal &#97;&#110;&#100; brief, &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#115;&#111; much &#111;&#102; &#97;&#110;<br /> order &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), dated September 11,<br /> 2008, &#97;&#115; granted &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; branch &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; plaintiff&#39;s motion &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; &#119;&#97;&#115; &#102;&#111;&#114; summary<br /> judgment declaring &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#105;&#116;&#115; mortgage &#111;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; subject property &#105;&#115; null &#97;&#110;&#100; void,<br /> &#97;&#110;&#100; denied &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; branch &#111;&#102; &#105;&#116;&#115; cross motion &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; &#119;&#97;&#115; &#102;&#111;&#114; &#8230;</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#67;&#72;&#79;&#73;&#67;&#69; &amp; ORDER &#73;&#110; December 1998, &#116;&#104;&#101; plaintiff &#98;&#111;&#117;&#103;&#104;&#116; &#116;&#104;&#101; subject property. &#83;&#104;&#101;<br /> financed &#104;&#101;&#114; &#98;&#117;&#121; &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; a mortgage loan. &#73;&#110; April 2004, &#116;&#104;&#101; plaintiff &#104;&#97;&#100;<br /> &#99;&#101;&#114;&#116;&#97;&#105;&#110; discussions &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; representatives &#111;&#102; a company allegedly offering<br /> services &#102;&#111;&#114; refinancing mortgage loans. Two months later, &#116;&#104;&#101; plaintiff,<br /> believing &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#115;&#104;&#101; &#119;&#97;&#115; signing documents &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#119;&#111;&#117;&#108;&#100; effectuate a refinancing &#111;&#102;<br /> &#104;&#101;&#114; mortgage loan, unwittingly executed a deed conveying title &#116;&#111; &#116;&#104;&#101; subject<br /> propert<span></span>y &#116;&#111; &#8230;</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.loislaw.com/advsrny/flwhitview.htp?lwhitid=8833410" target="_blank">MAIORINO v. GALINDO, 2008-06047 [2d Dept 8-4-2009] 2008-06047</a></p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#67;&#104;&#111;&#115;&#101; &#111;&#110; August 4, 2009.</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#73;&#110; &#97;&#110; action, inter alia, &#116;&#111; impose a constructive trust<br /> &#111;&#110; &#99;&#101;&#114;&#116;&#97;&#105;&#110; real property, &#116;&#104;&#101; defendants Steve Galindo, Michael Madia, James<br /> Napolitano, Demo Works, Inc., Kitchen Designs &#98;&#121; Dependable, Inc., &#97;&#110;&#100;<br /> &quot;ABC Corp.,&quot; &#97;&#115; successor &#105;&#110; interest &#116;&#111; Kitchen Designs &#98;&#121;<br /> Dependable, Inc., appeal, &#97;&#115; limited &#98;&#121; &#116;&#104;&#101;&#105;&#114; notice &#111;&#102; appeal &#97;&#110;&#100; brief, &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109;<br /> &#115;&#111; much &#111;&#102; &#97;&#110; order &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated<br /> &#77;&#97;&#121; 22, 2008, &#97;&#115; denied those branches &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; defendants&#39; motion &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; &#119;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#116;&#111;<br /> &#8230;</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#67;&#72;&#79;&#73;&#67;&#69; &amp; ORDER &#84;&#104;&#101; plaintiff, Edward Maiorino, &#119;&#104;&#111; &#119;&#97;&#115; a 50%<br /> shareholder &#105;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; defendant Demo Works, Inc. (hereinafter Demo), alleged,<br /> inter alia, &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#116;&#104;&#101; defendant Steve Galindo, &#119;&#104;&#111; &#119;&#97;&#115; &#97;&#108;&#115;&#111; a 50% shareholder &#105;&#110;<br /> Demo, improperly diverted assets &#111;&#102; Demo &#116;&#111; improve real property &#105;&#110; Bethpage<br /> (hereinafter &#116;&#104;&#101; Bethpage property). &#84;&#104;&#101; defendant Michael Madia &#104;&#97;&#100; &#98;&#111;&#117;&#103;&#104;&#116;<br /> &#116;&#104;&#101; Bethpage property &#105;&#110; &#104;&#105;&#115; &#111;&#119;&#110; name &#97;&#110;&#100; financed &#116;&#104;&#101; &#98;&#117;&#121; &#98;&#121; obtaining<br /> mortgages &#102;&#111;&#114; &#116;&#104;&#101; full purc<span></span>hase &#8230;</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.loislaw.com/advsrny/flwhitview.htp?lwhitid=8813230" target="_blank">BYRON v. HAAS, 2008-01977 [2d Dept 7-28-2009] 2008-01977</a></p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#67;&#104;&#111;&#115;&#101; &#111;&#110; July 28, 2009.</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#73;&#110; &#97;&#110; action &#116;&#111; recover &#104;&#117;&#114;&#116;&#115; &#102;&#111;&#114; fraud &#97;&#110;&#100; breach &#111;&#102;<br /> contract, &#116;&#104;&#101; plaintiff appeals, &#97;&#115; limited &#98;&#121; &#104;&#101;&#114; brief, &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#115;&#111; much &#111;&#102; &#97;&#110;<br /> undated order &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), &#97;&#115; granted &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116;<br /> branch &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; cross motion &#111;&#102; &#116;&#104;&#101; defendant John Spanakos pursuant &#116;&#111; CPLR 3211(a)(7)<br /> &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; &#119;&#97;&#115; &#116;&#111; dismiss &#116;&#104;&#101; complaint insofar &#97;&#115; asserted against &#104;&#105;&#109; &#97;&#110;&#100;, &#105;&#110;<br /> effect, upon searching &#116;&#104;&#101; record, dismissed &#116;&#104;&#101; complaint &#105;&#110; &#105;&#116;&#115; entirety<br /> insofar &#97;&#115; asserted against &#116;&#104;&#101; defendants Michelle Haas, &#8230;</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#84;&#104;&#101; plaintiff<br /> commenced &#116;&#104;&#101; instant action &#116;&#111; recover &#104;&#101;&#114; commission asserting fraud &#97;&#110;&#100;<br /> breach &#111;&#102; contract theories &#111;&#102; liability, &#97;&#110;&#100; &#116;&#104;&#101; defendant John Spanakos<br /> counterclaimed against &#104;&#101;&#114; &#116;&#111; recover &#104;&#117;&#114;&#116;&#115; &#102;&#111;&#114; libel per se &#97;&#110;&#100; malicious<br /> prosecution. &#84;&#104;&#101; plaintiff &#119;&#101;&#110;&#116;, pursuant &#116;&#111; CPLR 3211(a)(7) &#97;&#110;&#100; CPLR 3016(a),<br /> &#116;&#111; dismiss &#116;&#104;&#101; counterclaims, &#97;&#110;&#100; Spanakos cross-&#119;&#101;&#110;&#116;, pursuant &#116;&#111; CPLR<br /> 3211(a)(7), &#116;&#111; dismiss &#116;&#104;&#101; complaint insofar &#97;&#115; asserted against &#104;&#105;&#109;. &#84;&#104;&#101;<br /> Supreme Cour<span></span>t &#8230;</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.loislaw.com/advsrny/flwhitview.htp?lwhitid=8800036" target="_blank">LEIST v. TUGENDHAFT, 2009-03562 [2d Dept 7-21-2009] 2009-03562</a></p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#67;&#104;&#111;&#115;&#101; &#111;&#110; July 21, 2009.</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;">&#67;&#72;&#79;&#73;&#67;&#69; &amp; ORDER &#84;&#104;&#101; plaintiff commenced &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; action,<br /> inter alia, &#102;&#111;&#114; specific performance &#111;&#102; a purported contract &#102;&#111;&#114; &#116;&#104;&#101; sale &#111;&#102;<br /> real property &#97;&#110;&#100; filed a notice &#111;&#102; pendency against &#116;&#104;&#101; defendants&#39; beachfront<br /> property located &#105;&#110; Westhampton, &#78;&#101;&#119; York. &#84;&#104;&#101; purported contract consisted &#111;&#102;<br /> a &quot;Memo &#111;&#102; Sale,&quot; subscribed &#98;&#121; &#110;&#111; one, sent &#97;&#115; &#97;&#110; attachment &#116;&#111; &#97;&#110;<br /> e-mail &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#116;&#104;&#101; defendants&#39;&quot;listing agent&quot; &#116;&#111; &#116;&#104;&#101; plaintiff&#39;s<br /> attorney. &#84;&#104;&#101; plaintiff wrote &#111;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; memo &#111;&#102; sale &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#104;&#101; unconditionally<br /> accepted &#8230; General Obligations Law &#39; 5-703(2) states &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; a contract &#102;&#111;&#114; &#116;&#104;&#101;<br /> sale &#111;&#102; real property &quot;&#105;&#115; void unless &#116;&#104;&#101; contract &#111;&#114; &#115;&#111;&#109;&#101; note &#111;&#114;<br /> memorandum thereof, expressing &#116;&#104;&#101; consideration, &#105;&#115; &#105;&#110; writing, subscribed &#98;&#121;<br /> &#116;&#104;&#101; party &#116;&#111; &#98;&#101; charged, &#111;&#114; &#98;&#121; &#104;&#105;&#115; lawful agent thereunto authorized &#98;&#121;<br /> writing.&quot; Assuming, arguendo, &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#97;&#110; e-mail &#105;&#115; sufficient &#116;&#111; comply &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104;<br /> &#116;&#104;&#101; statute &#111;&#102; frauds &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; respect &#116;&#111; contracts &#102;&#111;&#114; &#116;&#104;&#101; conveyance &#111;&#102; real<br /> property (see General Obligations Law &#39; 5-703[<span> </span>2]; &#8230;</p><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"><p class="MsoPlainText" style="font-family: Arial;"> <span style="font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial;"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"></span></span></em></strong></span><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11px; font-family: Arial;"><br /></span><span><o:p></o:p></span></p></p></p><div class="shr-publisher-7"></div><p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2011/01/mortgage-assignments-are-not-the-real-estate-investors-dream/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor&#8217;s Dream!'>Mortgage Assignments are Not the Real Estate Investor&#8217;s Dream!</a></li><li><a href='http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/06/dont-say-i-didnt-warn-you-ny-attorney-generals-crackdown-on-the-loan-modification-industry/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: DON&#8217;T SAY I DIDN&#8217;T WARN YOU! NY Attorney General&#8217;s Crackdown on the Loan Modification Industry'>DON&#8217;T SAY I DIDN&#8217;T WARN YOU! NY Attorney General&#8217;s Crackdown on the Loan Modification Industry</a></li><li><a href='http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2008/06/the-new-york-law-journal-free-breaking-news-chief-judge-unveils-program-to-deal-with-dramatic-rise-in-foreclosures/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The New York Law Journal &#8211; Free Breaking News: Chief Judge Unveils Program to Deal With Dramatic Rise in Foreclosures'>The New York Law Journal &#8211; Free Breaking News: Chief Judge Unveils Program to Deal With Dramatic Rise in Foreclosures</a></li></ol></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/08/real-estate-law-update-new-york-state-decisions-of-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.nyrelawyers.com @ 2012-02-04 17:05:47 by W3 Total Cache -->
