<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: U.S. Treasury: Putting the &#8216;Short&#8217; Back in Short Sales?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/12/u-s-treasury-putting-the-short-back-in-short-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/12/u-s-treasury-putting-the-short-back-in-short-sales/</link> <description>Thoughts, Musings, Analysis on Law &#38; Real Estate</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Don&#8217;t Believe the Hype: FHA&#8217;s Temporary Waiver of 90 Seasoning Rule &#124; Blackacre 2.0</title><link>http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/12/u-s-treasury-putting-the-short-back-in-short-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link> <dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Believe the Hype: FHA&#8217;s Temporary Waiver of 90 Seasoning Rule &#124; Blackacre 2.0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyrelawyers.com/?p=138#comment-242</guid> <description>[...] Perhaps the Treasury will revise its Directive and remove this offending language (which, as I had discussed previously, is extremely [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Perhaps &#116;&#104;&#101; Treasury &#119;&#105;&#108;&#108; revise &#105;&#116;&#115; Directive &#97;&#110;&#100; remove &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; offending language (&#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104;, &#97;&#115; I &#104;&#97;&#100; discussed previously, &#105;&#115; extremely [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kathleen A. Scanlon</title><link>http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/12/u-s-treasury-putting-the-short-back-in-short-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link> <dc:creator>Kathleen A. Scanlon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:11:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyrelawyers.com/?p=138#comment-67</guid> <description>The problem is that a retail buyer is usually not receiving an assignment of Beneficial Ownership but a deed from the Trustee so the trust would not be viable as an alternative in these types of transactions.  However, this is very preliminary analysis at this point.  The 90 day restriction is, in essence, a restraint on alienation.  Further, there may be language to be added to the contract that might negate same.As far as property listing, you can easily see which industry has a very strong lobby..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#84;&#104;&#101; problem &#105;&#115; &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; a retail buyer &#105;&#115; usually &#110;&#111;&#116; receiving &#97;&#110; assignment &#111;&#102; Beneficial Ownership &#98;&#117;&#116; a deed &#102;&#114;&#111;&#109; &#116;&#104;&#101; Trustee &#115;&#111; &#116;&#104;&#101; trust &#119;&#111;&#117;&#108;&#100; &#110;&#111;&#116; &#98;&#101; viable &#97;&#115; &#97;&#110; alternative &#105;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101;&#115;&#101; types &#111;&#102; transactions.  &#66;&#117;&#116;, &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; &#105;&#115; very preliminary analysis &#97;&#116; &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; point.  &#84;&#104;&#101; 90 day restriction &#105;&#115;, &#105;&#110; essence, a restraint &#111;&#110; alienation.  Further, &#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#109;&#97;&#121; &#98;&#101; language &#116;&#111; &#98;&#101; added &#116;&#111; &#116;&#104;&#101; contract &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#109;&#105;&#103;&#104;&#116; negate same.</p><p>&#65;&#115; far &#97;&#115; property listing, &#121;&#111;&#117; &#99;&#97;&#110; easily see &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; industry &#104;&#97;&#115; a very strong lobby..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas Bentivoglio</title><link>http://www.nyrelawyers.com/2009/12/u-s-treasury-putting-the-short-back-in-short-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas Bentivoglio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyrelawyers.com/?p=138#comment-66</guid> <description>Interesting and informative post!! With any kind of luck the 90 re-sale restriction may have language that forbids a transfer of Title, in which case Land Trust usage will increase dramatically and will provide a loop hole. The only difference is that end buyers will be accepting conveyance by Assignment of B.I instead of a conveyance of Title...might be a pain in the arse getting their attorneys to agree!It also irritates me that the property has to be listed...still there may be a way around that also...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#70;&#97;&#115;&#99;&#105;&#110;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#110;&#103; &#97;&#110;&#100; informative post!! &#87;&#105;&#116;&#104; &#97;&#110;&#121; kind &#111;&#102; luck &#116;&#104;&#101; 90 re-sale restriction &#109;&#97;&#121; &#104;&#97;&#118;&#101; language &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; forbids a transfer &#111;&#102; Title, &#105;&#110; &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; case Land Trust usage &#119;&#105;&#108;&#108; increase dramatically &#97;&#110;&#100; &#119;&#105;&#108;&#108; provide a loop hole. &#84;&#104;&#101; &#111;&#110;&#108;&#121; &#100;&#105;&#102;&#102;&#101;&#114;&#101;&#110;&#99;&#101; &#105;&#115; &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#101;&#110;&#100; buyers &#119;&#105;&#108;&#108; &#98;&#101; accepting conveyance &#98;&#121; Assignment &#111;&#102; B.I instead &#111;&#102; a conveyance &#111;&#102; Title&#8230;&#109;&#105;&#103;&#104;&#116; &#98;&#101; a pain &#105;&#110; &#116;&#104;&#101; arse getting &#116;&#104;&#101;&#105;&#114; attorneys &#116;&#111; agree!</p><p>&#73;&#116; &#97;&#108;&#115;&#111; irritates &#109;&#101; &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#116;&#104;&#101; property &#104;&#97;&#115; &#116;&#111; &#98;&#101; listed&#8230;still &#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#109;&#97;&#121; &#98;&#101; a way around &#116;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#97;&#108;&#115;&#111;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.nyrelawyers.com @ 2012-02-10 03:02:41 by W3 Total Cache -->
